Home

Bolzen einen Brief schreiben Richtig shoe branding europe bvba v adidas and ohim Sagen Sehvermögen Das Bett machen

Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the  Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR  Developments
Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments

Shoe Branding Europe BVBA | Trademark and Copyright Law
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA | Trademark and Copyright Law

6/19/2019 CURIA - Documents curia.europa.eu /juris/document/document_print.jsf?docid=215208&text=&dir=&doclang=EN&
6/19/2019 CURIA - Documents curia.europa.eu /juris/document/document_print.jsf?docid=215208&text=&dir=&doclang=EN&

TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (Cap. 559) OPPOSITION TO TRADE MARK APPLICATION NO.:  303083788 MARK: CLASSES: 30, 31, 32 and 35 APPLICA
TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (Cap. 559) OPPOSITION TO TRADE MARK APPLICATION NO.: 303083788 MARK: CLASSES: 30, 31, 32 and 35 APPLICA

Adidas v Shoe Branding—Why Adidas's Three-stripe Mark Means More than  Stripes – Infusion Lawyers
Adidas v Shoe Branding—Why Adidas's Three-stripe Mark Means More than Stripes – Infusion Lawyers

Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA  against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v. Adidas AG
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v. Adidas AG

Adidas Successful in Three-stripe Opposition Case
Adidas Successful in Three-stripe Opposition Case

CURIA - Documentos
CURIA - Documentos

The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion  Industry
The Five Sense: The Rise of Non-Traditional Trademarks in the Fashion Industry

Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe  Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv
Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes  trademark: Dennemeyer
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual  property | The Guardian
Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual property | The Guardian

Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe  case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat

Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Hong Kong: A blow to the giant – Adidas loses trademark battle against Shoe  Branding Europe BVBA - Asia Law Network Blog
Hong Kong: A blow to the giant – Adidas loses trademark battle against Shoe Branding Europe BVBA - Asia Law Network Blog

The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes  trademark: Dennemeyer
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer

adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel  stripes placed on the side of sports shoes
adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel stripes placed on the side of sports shoes

Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand
Adidas Loses Trademark Infringement Lawsuit to Japanese Footwear Brand

Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe  case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat

CURIA - Documents
CURIA - Documents

CURIA - Documents
CURIA - Documents